Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
Dobronski v. Advocate Health, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10330
Defendant:
Anjli Joshi, Jessica Lynn Diarse, Advocate Health, LLC d/b/a Advocate Health Advisors Doing business as Advocate Health Advisors and others
Plaintiff:
Mark W Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jonathan DavisIn re: Jonathan Davis
as 22-2081
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN HALE DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hale v. Smith County et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Vernon Dale Hale
Defendant:
Smith County, Lynn Shrum and Jenna Meness
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hale v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hale
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Richard Hale v. Morgan Stanley
as 21-4184
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD "RIP" HALE
Respondent / Appellee:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, dba Morgan Stanley Wealth Management
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
