Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Houston v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brian Houston
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Matthew Eisenhower, Chris Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Ronald Myers v. USA
as 21-2979
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD BRUCE MYERS, aka James K. Richey, aka Michael Thompson, aka Grover Steven Sanders, aka Richard Brown, aka Richard Green, aka Justin W. Maury
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Ronald Myers
as 21-2918
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD BRUCE MYERS, aka James K. Richey, aka Michael Thompson, aka Grover Steven Sanders, aka Richard Brown, aka Richard Green, aka Justin W. Maury
Belle v. Concentrix et al
as 2:2018cv11328
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Belle
Defendant:
Concentrix, Richard Brown, LaTonia Stokes and others
Taylor #224931 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown Taylor #224931
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00057
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown, Louis Mancusco and Robert J. Brinson
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
3rd_pty_defendant:
Robert Pearlman and Pearlman & Pearlman, Attorneys at Law, P.C.
Interested_party:
Equity Trust Company
Katz et al v. MRT Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
Marvin A. Katz, Eloise Dabney, Ricky Tate and others
Defendant:
MRT Holdings, LLC, MRT, LLC, James Clements and others
Receiver:
James D. Sallah
Richardson et al v. Childers Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Josephine Richardson, Elaine Painter, Rita Hall and others
Defendant:
Childers Oil Company, Inc., Childers Oil Company, Inc., Childers Oil Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
