Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In re: Richard Duerson
as 24-5211
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD C. DUERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Meisels v. GP Strategies Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12124
Plaintiff:
Jacob Meisels
Defendant:
GP Strategies Corporation, Scott N. Greenberg, Marshall S. Geller and others
Monclova Christian Academy, et al v. Toledo-Lucas Cnty Health Dept
as 20-4300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, dba Ohio Christian Education Association, MONCLOVA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOLEDO-LUCAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Amicus Curiae:
CAROLINE MALA CORBIN, RICHARD C. SCHRAGGER, MICHAEL C. DORF and others
Martin v. Calhoun County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Martin
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department, Daniel J. Stulberg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Joe Hand Promotions, Incorporated v. Riverwood Recreation Center, Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv10661
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Incorporated
Defendant:
Riverwood Recreation Center, Incorporated, Richard C. Figg and Betty J. Figg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ackourey v. Noblehouse Custom Tailors, et al.
as 1:2014mc00042
Plaintiff:
Richard C Ackourey, Jr.
Defendant:
Noblehouse Custom Tailors and Vijay Wadwani
Ackourey v. Nandwani et al
as 3:2013cv01280
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Ackourey, Jr.
Defendant:
Isaac Nandwani and Nandwani's Custom Tailors
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Ackourey v. Nandwani's, et al.
as 2:2013cv02898
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Ackourey, Jr.
Defendant:
Nandwani's LLC and Peter Nandwani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Ackourey v. Royal Tailors, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00854
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Ackourey, Jr.
Defendant:
Royal Tailors, LLC , Avi S. Lulla and Steve Lulla
Counter_claimant:
Steve Lulla , Royal Tailors, LLC and Avi S. Lulla
Counter_defendant:
Richard C. Ackourey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
