Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Theodoro et al v. Middlesex Hospital et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
Middlesex Hospital, Ahmet Semh Gork, Anne S. Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry et al v. Top Jump LLC
as 3:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Mechelle Curry
Defendant:
Top Jump LLC doing business as Top Jump Trampoline & Extreme Arena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Currie v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02022
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Tungate et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Elaine Curry and Buford Thomas Tungate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Theodoro et al v. Middlesex Hospital
as 3:2020cv00992
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
Middlesex Hospital, CT DCF Ombudsmans of 505 Hudson Street, Alyssa Glasow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roark v. Hearn Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Soon Roark
Defendant:
Thomas D. Curry and Hearn Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Curry v. Saloon et al
as 2:2019cv04765
Defendant:
Muddy Creek Saloon, Amy Levy and Samuel Levy
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Curry v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03095
Plaintiff:
Amanda Curry
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Curry v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45512
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
