Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Logan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01818
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James P Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bracknell v. Boyd et al (PLR1)
as 3:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Kim Logan, Angela Boyd and Logan Kim
Plaintiff:
Luther Bracknell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Ballad Health et al
as 2:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Ballad Health, Logan Blakely and John (Jane) Doe
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2020op45058
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., MD William Valuck and others
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Logan County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fiscal Court of Logan County Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45951
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Fiscal Court of Logan County Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Logan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01134
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenji Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montie v. Crossfire, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10455
Defendant:
Crossfire, LLC and Logan Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Joseph Montie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charlton v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (PLR1)
as 2:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Ashley Charlton and Logan Charlton
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Szidik v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2018cv01115
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Logan Szidik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazelwood v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Logan R. Hazelwood
Defendant:
Todd Dorsett, Amy Farrell, Emily Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
