Cases 1 - 10 of 2,472
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sandra Williams and Gregory Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Muniz v. Farnsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Rufino Muniz
Defendant:
William Farnsworth and Mackie Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mabry et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
William Mabry and Joyce Mabry
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lightner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
William Lightner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02836
Plaintiff:
Erica Williams
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02699
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Taylor, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Black v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02563
Plaintiff:
William Black
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duzenski v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
William Duzenski
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
William F. Thomas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al v. Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams and Elmer Vernon Williams
Defendant:
Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
