Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Coleman v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10316
Plaintiff:
Eionna Coleman
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Marcal Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Prince v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mark Prince
Defendant:
Rickie Jones and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thornton v. Singh et al
as 6:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Claudine Thornton
Defendant:
Hardeep Singh, Spartan Freight Systems, Inc., U.S. Xpress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Debra C. Hall and Brian Hall
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Michael Wenzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawk v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2019cv00164
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry C Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory v. Johnson et al
as 6:2019cv00017
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., Edwin D. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Akouton v. Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv13983
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fawaza Akouton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Badovick v. Laureano et al
as 1:2018cv02085
Plaintiff:
Brittany Badovick
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., Alexandria Laureano, Total Transportation of Mississippi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesser v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00983
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., State of Ohio Department of Medicaid, Robert Jerell Rader and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany L. Nesser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fonseca v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fonseca
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Roberto Hernandez DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
