Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Sesi v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 2:2009cv10873
Plaintiff:
Gary Sesi
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase and Company, JPMorgan Chase and Company, JPMorgan Chase and Company and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Adams v. Potter et al
as 1:2008cv00526
Plaintiff:
Gary Adams
Defendant:
John Potter, John Potter, Michael Vance and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Duncan et al v. Gary Matthews of Jackson
as 1:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Duncan and Hattie B. Duncan
Defendant:
Gary Matthews of Jackson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medrano v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2008cv10239
Plaintiff:
Gary Medrano
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ervin et al v. BDO Seidman, LLP et al
as 4:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
Gary Ervin, Lisa Ervin, Robert W. Ervin and others
Defendant:
BDO Seidman, LLP and David DiMuzio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cress v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv00436
Plaintiff:
Gary Cress
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC, Weltman, Weltman & Reis Co., L.P.A. and Joseph M. McCandlish
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Samples v. Wescott Mortgage and Capital, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv00427
Plaintiff:
Michelle Samples
Defendant:
Wescott Mortgage and Capital, LLC, America's Wholesale Lender and Gary Mason
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gordon et al v. Bank of America Corporation
as 1:2007cv00237
Plaintiff:
J. Lea Gordon and Gary Gordon
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Carlisle, et al v. Curtis, Mallet, et al
as 06-5290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAYNE CARLISLE, WJG STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS, LLC, WC THOMAS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE, LLP, WILLIAM L. BRICKER, JR., c/o Curtis, Mallet-Provost, Colt & Mosle, LLP, ARTHUR ANDERSON, LLP and others
Defendant:
BRICOLAGE, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
