Cases 71 - 80 of 128
W.J. O'Neil Company v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, et al
as 13-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
W.J. O'NEIL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEPLEY, BULFINCH, RICHARDSON & ABBOTT, INC. and SMITH SECKMAN REID, INC.
Shultz v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00947
Plaintiff:
Joe Shultz
Defendant:
Clayton Smith, Mickey Miller and Diamond Seal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nance v. Zwicker & Associates, PC et al
as 1:2013cv01604
Plaintiff:
Constance D. Nance
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, PC , Derek Scranton and Anne Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Suburban Ann Arbor, LLC
as 2:2013cv12806
Defendant:
Suburban Ann Arbor, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cherice Smith
Schneider et al v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01175
Plaintiff:
John E. Schneider , Andrew R. Bucher and Robert Smith
Defendant:
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bruce Bandy, et al v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 11-4184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE BANDY, BARBARA ANTHONY, LISA ASHBY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH THIRD BANK, PARK NATIONAL BANK and U.S. BANK, as the corporate successor, other, Star Bank, N.A. other, Firstar Bank, N.A.
Hester v. E-Loan Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hester
Defendant:
E-Loan Inc., Paul Brown, Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Other Fraud
Smith et al v. Norcold, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10841
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Smith and Cheryl Smith
Defendant:
Norcold, Inc., Alcoa, Inc., Alcoa Energy Services, Inc. and others
Smith v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv15509
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., LTD
Smith v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Randall Smith
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
