Cases 121 - 130 of 71,117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peels v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Peels
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services/CPS et al
as 1:2024cv11399
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services/CPS, Lori Budnik and Maelyn Morang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosas v. Michigan Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv11400
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosas
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, Child Protective Services, Lori Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Brighton Health Center Emergency et al
as 2:2024cv11395
Plaintiff:
Quan D. Wade
Defendant:
Brighton Health Center Emergency, Rami Kaakaji, Stephanie Falbo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gibson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2024cv02354
Plaintiff:
Terrell Gibson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lesley Vowels v. KY, et al
as 24-5508
Plaintiff:
LESLEY VOWELS
Defendant:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, GENE SNYDER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
