Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Dequita Burks v. Lewis Eiseman, et al
as 22-1183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEQUITA BURKS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rodriguez Burks, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
LEWIS EISEMAN, Corrections Officer, DONALD PEER, Corrections Officer, GREGORY EXELBY, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burke et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Maureen Burke, James Todd Malone, Bryan Scott Williams and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Lloyd Austin III, Martin J. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burke v. Parker
as 3:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Jack Burke
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuntz et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rachel L Kuntz, R.D.B. and Britton Ashton Bowers
Defendant:
Amanda Burke Garrison, Chad Lewis and Andrea Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Breckinridge County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Vicki Woodruff, Bruce Anthony, Breckinridge County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
