Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Beal v. Stanton
as 2:2017cv10843
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Beal
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Catron v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2016cv02661
Plaintiff:
Lucille Catron
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Terrence Patterson , Beale Street Merchant Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blythe et al v. Schlievert et al
as 3:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Molly S. Blythe , K. B. and L. B.
Defendant:
Randall S. Schlievert , Rayyan M. Anwer , Tiffany A. Lisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gebhardt v. Beal Financial Corporation et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Catherine Gebhardt
Defendant:
Beal Financial Corporation, Lorraine Brown, Joyce Linger and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Tiger v. Jason Pynkala, et al
as 15-5103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGER
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON S. PYNKALA, Officer, Individually, CAMRON S. BRIGGS, Officer, Individually, LT. CHRISTOPHER MOFFATT, Individually and others
Tiger v. Pynkala et al
as 2:2014cv02312
Plaintiff:
Tiger
Defendant:
Jason S. Pynkala, Camron S. Briggs, Christopher Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Clinton, Township of et al
as 2:2013cv13014
Plaintiff:
Derick D Williams
Defendant:
Clinton, Township of, Clinton Township Housing Commission, PREMIER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Beal et al v. Benton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
Beverly Beal and Rhonda Tippit
Defendant:
Benton County, Tennessee and Benton County Board of Commissioners
Miscellaneou:
Timothy R. Burrus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
