Cases 11 - 20 of 191
Orr v. Busacca et al
as 2:2022cv12280
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Orr
Defendant:
David Busacca, Brian Kolodziej [E-filer], Detective Michael Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Carswell v. Armstrong
as 2:2022cv12097
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Carswell
Defendant:
Vanessa Maria Armstrong
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Servis et al v. Jang et al
as 1:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Servis, Jr. and Cassandra Lee Servis
Defendant:
Inyoung Jang, Inim Jang, Jang Family Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Eugene Habich v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 22-1517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE HABICH
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, JOHN WOJCIECHOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER MITTLESTAT
Aaron v. King et al
as 4:2022cv11062
Plaintiff:
Derek Aaron
Defendant:
Officer Darren King, Officer Edward Pawlowski, Officer Eugene Fielder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Anthony Wehbe, et al v. Travis Kesecker, et al
as 22-3347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY WEHBE and REAGHAN NORTON
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS KESECKER and EUGENE SHIPPY, III
William Klaver v. Hamilton County, TN, et al
as 22-5083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM EUGENE KLAVER
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL CAMERON WILKEY, individually and in his capacity as deputy sheriff for Hamilton County
William Klaver v. Hamilton County, TN, et al
as 22-5084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM EUGENE KLAVER
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
TYLER SHANE MCRAE, individually and in his capacity as deputy sheriff for Hamilton County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
