Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Maxwell v. Fields
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bobbie A. Maxwell
Defendant:
Ian Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fields v. Hopson et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Fields
Defendant:
Jere Dee Hopson, Brad Harper, Stephen Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burns-Norris v. Murfreesboro Housing Authority et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
April Burns-Norris
Defendant:
Murfreesboro Housing Authority, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Southeast/Caribbean Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Hellen Ross McNabb Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Viau v. Pokley et al
as 2:2021cv12313
Plaintiff:
Tennille Viau
Defendant:
Greg Pokley, Troy Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation Detroit Field Office and others
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Raspberry v. Bramley et al
as 1:2021cv01055
Defendant:
Janae Fields, Jason McCalister, Rebecca Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Dameon Raspberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
