Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv10523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruse v. Blevins et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Wendell Cruse
Defendant:
Alfred Belvins, John Doe, Eric Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Frances Spurlock, et al v. David Fox, et al
as 12-5978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCES SPURLOCK, JEFFREY SPURLOCK, on behalf of their minor daughter, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KEITH CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MINISTER XUAM LAWSON and RIGENA LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. FOX, MARK NORTH, KAREN JOHNSON and others
Spurlock v. Connolly Consulting Associates Worldwide, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Christy Spurlock
Defendant:
Connolly Consulting Associates Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Morris v. McCallar et al
as 2:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
William D. Morris
Defendant:
C. James McCallar, Jr., The McCallar Law Firm, Michael Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spurlock et al v. Fox et al
as 3:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Frances Spurlock, Frances Spurlock, Jeffrey Spurlock and others
Defendant:
David A. Fox, Mark North, Karen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spurlock v. Dept of U.S. Army et al
as 2:2007cv02200
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lester Spurlock
Defendant:
Dept of U.S. Army and John Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spurlock v. Voorhies et al
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daniel Spurlock
Defendant:
Edwin Voorhies, Cynthia Davis and Matthew Stuntbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
