Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwin v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC, Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Garner & Conner, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cathie L Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harrison v. City of Dickson, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Paul David Harrison
Defendant:
City of Dickson, Tennessee and Seth Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2011cv00853
Plaintiff:
Deshawn L Goodwin
Defendant:
City of Columbus , Roy J Lisath and Jeremy Niederkohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Andrews
as 1:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tracy Larenzo Goodwin
Defendant:
Emma Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2011cv02047
Plaintiff:
Edward Norfleet
Defendant:
Larry Goodwin, Atwater and OCU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elizabeth Goodwin, et al v. City of Painesville et al
as 1:2010cv02883
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Goodwin and Rebecca Carlucci
Defendant:
City of Painesville , Roberto Soto , William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Johnson v. Scioto County, et al
as 10-4309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCIOTO COUNTY and P. HULL, Scioto County Police Officer
Defendant - Appellant:
DENVER TRIGGS, Scioto County Police Officer and NICK GOODWIN, Scioto County Police Officer
Smallwood v. Goodwin et al
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Smallwood
Defendant:
James Goodwin, John M Manos, Gregory White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
