Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Russell Marcilis, II, et al v. Township of Redford, et al
as 10-2683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUSSELL MARCILIS, II, FELICIA MARCILIS, JASMINE MARCILIS and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD, KEVIN JEZIOROWSKI, WILLIAM HAND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN JONES, ERIC WOODALL, ERIC GILLMAN and others
Coontz v. Gaddis et al
as 5:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Sherry Coontz
Defendant:
Wes Gaddis, Chris Kehrt, Mercer County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lattanzio et al v. Ackerman et al
as 5:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Lattanzio and Sandra Lattanzio
Defendant:
Thomas M. Ackerman, Mahogany Hill Farm LLC, Dawn Jarrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dontrell Brothers v. Matt Hamberg
as 08-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTRELL BROTHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT HAMBERG, MATTHEW VANLIERE, ALLISON BAKER and others
Jenkins et al v. Ann Arbor Police Department
as 2:2007cv13860
Plaintiff:
Van Jenkins, Amber L. Boyles, Gawain S. Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Ann Arbor Police Department
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
