Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Harrison v. Woolridge et al
as 3:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
Salisa Luster Harrison
Defendant:
Rick Woolridge, Brian Tucker, Robert C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratterman v. Ramey et al
as 3:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ratterman
Defendant:
Randall Ramey and Steve Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frisby v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
Roger Frisby
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government and Steve Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.H. v. Conrad et al
as 3:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
J.H.
Defendant:
Steve Conrad , Curt Flynn , Nathaniel Rausch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scanlan v. Conrad
as 3:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scanlan
Defendant:
Steve Conrad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jonathan Parr, et al v. David Owen, III, et al
as 17-5344
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PARR
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HEATH CONRAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID S. OWEN, III, In his official and Individual capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Lauderdale County, TN
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, In their individual and official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Lauderdale County, TN
Conrad et al v. City of Berea et al
as 1:2016cv02525
Plaintiff:
Samuel Conrad and Geraldine Conrad
Defendant:
City of Berea , Cyril Kleem , Linda Marginian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beydoun v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 4:2014cv11945
Plaintiff:
Ali Baydoun, Ali Beydoun and Lamis Beydoun
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of, Dearborn Police Department, Police Chief Ronald Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parr et al v. Owen et al
as 2:2016cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Parr and David Heath Conrad
Defendant:
David S Owen, III and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. New
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government , Steve Conrad and Aaron Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
