Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Smith v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners , Gerald T. McFaul , City of Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bray v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00159
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners , Gerald T. McFaul , Cleveland, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Florence Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Gladys Wade
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners , Gerald T. McFaul , City of Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore, et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
JoAnne Moore , Bobbie Lee Dancy , Dorothy Pollard and others
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Georgia Hussein , Kristin Rayburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfeiffer v. Butler County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2010cv00672
Plaintiff:
Francis Nicole Pfeiffer
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriff Department, Butler County Sheriff Department, Corrections Division, Officer Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
McMahon v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Joseph McMahon, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
West Side Tenant Union et al v. City of Lexington
as 5:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
West Side Tenant Union and Joseph McMahon, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Lexington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Outdoor v. Romulus, City of et al
as 2:2007cv15125
Plaintiff:
International Outdoor and International Outdoor
Defendant:
Romulus, City of and Randy McMahon
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
