Cases 41 - 50 of 134
M. F., et al v. Perry Cnty Child & Family Svcs, et al
as 17-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. F., a minor, H. F., a minor and KARISMA FERREIRA, fka Mindy Fromhertz
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, AMY L. FRAME, WENDY WION and others
Defendant:
JOHN M. BUSH, TAMMY DIVERS, TIMOTHY A. SNIDER and others
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Nedra Hastings
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amponsah v. Trump
as 2:2017cv12950
Plaintiff:
Mabel Amponsah
Defendant:
Donald Trump, The Pesidents of United States of America, Barak Obama and others
Lewis v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Felton E. Lewis, III
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Kilpatrick Townsend, Jackson Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2017cv10186
Plaintiff:
Donnell Thomas
Defendant:
Wayne County , DEPUTY TOTH , DEPUTY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Capasso et al v. City of Westlake, Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv01753
Plaintiff:
Bethany Capasso , Jon Masterson , Daniel Bush and others
Defendant:
City of Westlake, Ohio , Kevin Bielozer , Mark Arcuri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richman v. Bush et al
as 2:2016cv02401
Plaintiff:
Elroy Ladell Richman
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
