Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Williams v. Drumright et al
as 3:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Alexander S. Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Drumright, Dearis Hoard, Shaun Erie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of John H. Jolley, Jr. et al v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Estate of John H. Jolley, Jr. , J. J., III and J. J.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government , Marc Christiansen and Steve Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connie Marshall v. Mike O'Connell, et al
as 14-6372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE O'CONNELL, County Attorney Commonwealth of KY, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF STEVE CONRAD, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Moore-El v. Hall et al
as 3:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Catherine Moore-El
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Kimetha Jones and Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baydoun v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11945
Plaintiff:
Ali Baydoun
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of , Dearborn Police Department , Police Chief Ronald Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beydoun v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 4:2014cv11945
Plaintiff:
Ali Baydoun, Ali Beydoun and Lamis Beydoun
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of, Dearborn Police Department, Police Chief Ronald Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Younker v. Curren
as 2:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Aaron D Younker
Defendant:
Conrad Curren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Younker v. Curren
as 1:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Aaron D Younker
Defendant:
Conrad Curren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holton v. Conrad et al
as 5:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
David Holton
Defendant:
Danny Conrad and Estill County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
