Cases 51 - 60 of 999
Corey Blocker v. Robert Jonker, et al
as 23-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DESHON BLOCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. JONKER, MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT AGENCY, HUNTINGTON BANK and others
Washington et al v. First National Bank
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dr. Leon Washington and Dr. Vanessa Washington
Defendant:
First National Bank and First National Bank of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Corey Lea v. First Bank, et al
as 23-5468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST BANK and LARRY F. HINTON
Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lundeen
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan Unemployment Agency, Bank Huntington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Fifth Third Bank, National Association
as 2:2023cv11018
Plaintiff:
Turone White
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Financial Corporation and Fifth Third Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Denise Sherrills v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-3374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE SHERRILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv10938
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Joseph Jones, Ernest Cornelius and John Doe
Counter Claimant:
Doshia Banks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
