Cases 51 - 60 of 140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 17-3225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARK HORNAK, Judge, ROBERT CESSAR, AUSA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doss v. Bevin et al
as 5:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
Angel Pastor Doss
Defendant:
Matt G. Bevin , Alison Lundergan Grimes , Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mark Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Stimmel v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-4196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LEE STIMMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv01071
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 0:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Acting Secretary Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
