Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Clifford Houston v. James Logan, Jr.
as 11-6379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. LOGAN, JR.
Clifford Houston v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ROBERT E. COOPER, Individually and Officially as Attorney General & Reporter, RANDY E. NICHOLS, Individually and Officially as 6th Judicial District Attorney General and others
Clifford Houston v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-5960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ROBERT E. COOPER, Individually and Officially as Attorney General & Reporter, RANDY E. NICHOLS, Individually and Officially as 6th Judicial District Attorney General and others
Clark et al v. Village of Enon et al
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Larry Ned Clark and Mary Kathryn Clark
Defendant:
Village of Enon, Clifford Vernon and Troy Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds et al v. Holder
as 3:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Reynolds, Jr., Donald R Reynolds, Sr, Janice Reynolds and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, James R. Dedrick, David Leen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Wicks et al
as 3:2011cv00268
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Jeffery Wicks, Mark N Foster, Russell Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gorzewlewski
as 5:2011cv12296
Plaintiff:
Clifford Johnson
Defendant:
Kinga Gorzewlewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifford Houston v. James Logan, Jr.
as 11-5563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. LOGAN, JR.
Houston v. Logan
as 3:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
James F. Logan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Houston v. James Logan, Jr.
as 11-5165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. LOGAN, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
