Cases 61 - 70 of 145
Terry Stimmel v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-4196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LEE STIMMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv01071
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 0:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Acting Secretary Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maclin v. Cuyahoga County's Ombudsman et al
as 1:2015cv01631
Plaintiff:
Mario Lawrence Maclin
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County's Ombudsman, Adult Protective Services, Murtis H. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaundon Washington v. FBI
as 15-5509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUNDON A. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
