Cases 71 - 80 of 3,347
Marra v. Anderson County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Marra
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Facility, Rocky Top Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kimball v. Village of South Russell, Ohio et al.
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Kimball
Defendant:
Village of South Russell, Ohio and Michael Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Reco Recardo Douglas
Defendant:
John Doe, Bobby Jones, Steve Godwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. et al v. Secretary of the Treasury et al.
as 1:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. and Robert J. Gargasz
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Richard K. Delmar, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wilfred Anderson v. Peter Corrigan
as 23-4032
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LOUIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JUDGE PETER J. CORRIGAN
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Hall v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tristan J Hall
Defendant:
Charme P Allen, William C Bright and Hector I Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
