Cases 81 - 90 of 241
Bailey et al v. Knox County Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bailey and Tina Bailey
Defendant:
Knox County Tennessee, Knox County Sheriff's Office, J. J. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurent v. Diltz et al
as 3:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jayme Laurent
Defendant:
Troy Diltz, Scott Short, Matthew Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Renner et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Norfleet
Defendant:
Heather Ann Renner, Judy Farris , Houston County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead et al v. Washington County et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tatia Dovie Whitehead and Eric Grant Whitehead
Defendant:
Washington County, Ed Graybeal, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milby v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Milby
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelmendi v. Pacito et al
as 2:2017cv12325
Plaintiff:
John P. Kelmendi
Defendant:
Bruno Pacito, Steve Klein-Knecht, Detroit Edison and others
Weinberg v. County of Shelby et al
as 2:2017cv02474
Plaintiff:
Adam Weinberg
Defendant:
County of Shelby, Shelby County Sheriffs Office, Arthur Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2017cv12191
Plaintiff:
Dallas Peterson
Defendant:
City of Detroit, James Craig, Scott Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dawson v. Benjamin et al
as 1:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dawson
Defendant:
David Benjamin , Richard Shofstall , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2017cv11240
Plaintiff:
Dequan Jamail Flowers
Defendant:
County of Macomb , Macomb County Jail , Macomb County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
