Cases 1 - 10 of 15
John Curran, III v. Carl Fronabarger, et al
as 24-5202
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Defendant:
CARL A. FRONABARGER, STATE OF TENNESSEE, J. BRENT BRADBURY and others
Shaffer v. Kalamazoo County Administration et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Shaffer
Defendant:
Kalamazoo County Administration and John Curran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
H. V., et al v. Cloverleaf Local School District Board of Education, et al
as 1:2021cv01731
Plaintiff:
H. V., S. V. and Amalie Flowers
Defendant:
Cloverleaf Local School District Board of Education, Dr. Daryl Kubilus, Jason Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOE v. Curran et al
as 1:2018cv11935
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Brendan P. Curran , Matthew Nowicki , Ron Puzon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit v. Century 21 Real Estate, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14217
Defendant:
Century 21 Real Estate, LLC and Curran & Christie, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Moody v. MI Gaming Control Bd, et al
as 16-1155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, SCOTT MCLEAY, STEVEN J. FERRARI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moody v. Michigan Gaming Control Board et al
as 2:2015cv11922
Plaintiff:
Daniel Moody
Defendant:
Michigan Gaming Control Board, Scott McLeay, Steven J Ferrari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
