Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Todd Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools, et al
as 24-3283
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
DANIEL SNIVLEY, Athletic Director, Individually, LEAH ARMSTRONG, Case Worker, Individually and BERNE UNION LOCAL SCHOOLS
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant:
Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02124
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Moody et al v. Gartha et al
as 2:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody and Tracey Moody
Defendant:
Russell Charles Gartha, Harrison Ray Higgins, City of Southfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bond v. Bob Caldwell Automotive Inc.
as 2:2023cv03522
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bond
Defendant:
Bob Caldwell Automotive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carter v. Bond
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Rodney Henry Carter
Defendant:
Robert Keith Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
