Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Burnett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Carmie Ronata Burnett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burnett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carolyn-Jean Burnett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Breen
as 2:2019cv02657
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Defendant:
J. Daniel Breen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stojcevski v. County of Macomb et al
as 4:2017cv11843
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Anthony M. Wickersham, Michelle M Sanborn and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Stojcevski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stojcevski et al v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2015cv11019
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Stojcevski and David Stojcevski
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Anthony M. Wickersham, Michelle M Sanborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts et al v. Schoolcraft College et al
as 2:2012cv15195
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Felts and Center Mass, Inc.
Defendant:
Schoolcraft College , Schoolcraft Community College District , Schoolcraft Community College District Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mason v. Holder et al
as 2:2011cv02099
Plaintiff:
Michael Darrow Mason
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Bill Haslam, Douglas H. Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
