Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Hawkins v. Carpenter, Jr et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Jr, Lylod Curry Brasfield and Cornelius Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agee, Jr. et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Donald Agee, Jr., Dennis Leory Black, Jr., Beverly Ann Burrell and others
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson, MICHIGAN INDEPENDENT CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, Douglas Clark and others
Interested Party:
Common Cause and Jon X. Eguia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Curry v. Trinity Health-Michigan
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Sonae Curry
Defendant:
Trinity Health-Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Rucker et al v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Tikeila Rucker, Rachael Spriggs, Damon Curry-Morris and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Carolyn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
