Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Storck v. Law Enforcement et al
as 5:2024cv11384
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Storck
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Detroit Edison Energy Company, Attorneys, Lawyers and Hospitals and others
Ramon Boyce v. City Hall for Springfield, OH, et al
as 23-3533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON BOYCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY HALL FOR SPRINGFIELD, OH, DAVID ANDREW WILSON, Senior Policy Advisor/Criminal Justice, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Boyce et al v. City Hall for Springfield Ohio et al
as 3:2019cv00181
Defendant:
Brian T Peabody, David Andrew Wilson, City Hall for Springfield Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Shaqueeta Terrell, Ramon Boyce, Alyshia Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Putnam County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Garrison
Defendant:
Putnam County, Tennessee , David Andrews , Brandon Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coggins v. Andrews et al
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Philip Edward Coggins
Defendant:
David Andrews, Putnam, County, Tennessee, Tim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Andrews et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Thomas Deloy Winningham
Defendant:
David Andrews, Putnam County, Tennessee, Tim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
