Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Martinez, Sr. et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11350
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr., Ana Martinez DeJesus, Yaritza Martinez DeJesus and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Dr. Carl Schmidt, Dr. Leigh Hlavaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeJesus et al v. Harvey et al
as 4:2022cv12879
Plaintiff:
George DeJesus and Melvin DeJesus
Defendant:
William Harvey, Chester S. Romatowski, Romatowski Consulting & Investigations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Vecchiarelli et al
as 1:2016cv01693
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, Solomon Oliver, Jr., F.B.I. Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Geiger, III et al v. Standard Parking Corporation IL et al
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
William Charles Geiger, III and Patricia Geiger
Defendant:
Standard Parking Corporation IL , City of Cleveland , Anthony J. Gorsek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geiger et al v. Standard Parking Corporation IL et al
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
William Charles Geiger, III and Patricia Geiger
Defendant:
Julio DeJesus, Jr. , Midgelio Carmargo, Jr. , Anthony J. Gorsek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cutler v. Scott et al
as 1:2009cv01238
Plaintiff:
Brenda Cutler
Defendant:
Jason Scott, Daryl G. Allen, Ilian DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
