Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mark Brown, et al v. Battle Creek Police Departmen, et al
as 16-1575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK BROWN and CHERYL BROWN
Defendant:
BATTLE CREEK POLICE DEPARTMENT, A Michigan Municipal Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY CASE, Sergeant, CITY OF BATTLE CREEK, a Michigan Municipal Corporation, CHRIS KLEIN, Officer and others
Brown et al v. Battle Creek Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Mark Brown and Cheryl Brown
Defendant:
Battle Creek Police Department , Jeffrey Case , Joel Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bigi et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv00282
Plaintiff:
David Bigi and Robert Bigi
Defendant:
Mark Brown , Jim Stull and City of Beavercreek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Reynolds v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 10-3098
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE REYNOLDS
Intervenor - Appellant:
MARK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, TERRY J. COLLINS, Warden, PHILLIP KERNS, Warden and others
Mark Brown v. City of Upper Arlington
as 09-4396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK BROWN
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON
Brown v. City of Upper Arlington
as 2:2008cv00849
Plaintiff:
Mark Brown
Defendant:
City of Upper Arlington and City of Upper Arlington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association et al v. J. Kenneth Blackwell et al
as 2:2006cv00745
Plaintiff:
King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association, King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association, Ohio Voter Rights Alliance for Democracy and others
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Brunner, Jennifer L. Brunner, Jennifer L. Brunner and others
Intervenor:
State Of Ohio
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The Ohio Election Justice Campaign, Paddy Shaffer, Marlys Barbee and others
Objector:
Michael Connell, Michael Connell, Michael Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
