Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dannie Rainey v. Perkins Township Board Of Trustees, et al
as 24-3564
Plaintiff:
DANNIE RAINEY
Defendant:
PERKINS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PERKINS TOWNSHIP, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH BAUMAN, Individually and in his official capacity as employee of Perkins Township Police Department and others
Rainey v. Perkins Township Board of Trustees et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Dannie Rainey
Defendant:
Perkins Township Board of Trustees, Perkins Township Police Department, Joseph Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rainey et al v. City of Knoxville, Tennessee
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Roger Rainey, Rick Davis and Ricky Davis
Defendant:
City of Knoxville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rainey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
William J Rainey
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Oscar Cataldi, A. Nakokenge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rainey v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
John Rainey
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
