Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Campbell v. Riahi, et al
as 1:2020cv00678
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Jones, April Riahi, Butler County, Ohio, Butler County Board Of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Cristi Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caddell v. Campbell et al
as 1:2019cv00091
Plaintiff:
Anselm Caddell
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Ohio, Joyce A Campbell and Richard Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Jones v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc, et al
as 18-4090
Defendant / Appellee:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. and JOHN ZLINSKI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2017cv12416
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jane Rhodes
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, John Doe/Jane Doe Quartermaster of Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. City of Sturgis, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tonja Gibson
Defendant:
City of Sturgis, Kentucky , Sturgis, Kentucky Police Department , Duane Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Richard Jones v. City of Memphis, et al
as 12-5558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS and JILL MADAJCZKY, Senior Assistant City Attorney for Memphis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
