Cases 1 - 10 of 12
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Davis v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Marvin T Davis
Defendant:
Officer Rachael Ward, Officer Ryan Morgan and City of Middletown Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Judy White, et al v. Delores Stephens, et al
as 13-5958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDY WHITE and GARY WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
DELORES STEPHENS, both personally and in her official capacity, CATHY GOETZ, both personally and in her official capacity, JOHNNY WILLIAMS, both personally and in his official capacity and others
White v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02441
Plaintiff:
Gary L. White
Defendant:
Delores Stephens, Cathy Goetz, Johnny Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02173
Plaintiff:
Judy White and Gary White
Defendant:
Delores Stephens, Cathy Goetz, Johnny Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick McCarthy v. Deborah Servitto, et al
as 11-2488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK MCCARTHY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. SERVITTO, MARILYN KELLY, MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and others
William Davis v. City of Murfreesboro
as 08-6495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MURFREESBORO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Candice Sulfridge, et al v. John Huff, et al
as 07-6180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CANDICE R. SULFRIDGE and ADAM T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN HUFF
Defendant:
LARRY G. MOORE, JANETTE HARRIS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
