Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Serrant v. Enqi Real & all constituents et al
as 2:2024cv11351
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Enqi Real & all constituents, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne P.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. TG Toledo, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission
Defendant:
TG Toledo, LLC, TG Toledo, LLC A Michigan Limited Liability Company, The Tobin Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shoemake v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, et al
as 1:2021cv00015
Defendant:
John Bond, Edward Sheldon, Janet Tobin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome F. Shoemake and Jerome Fontaine Shoemake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jezowski et al v. Arenac, County of et al
as 1:2016cv13242
Plaintiff:
Theodore Jezowski, Sr and Stephanie Jezowski
Defendant:
Arenac, County of, Tina Thompson, Arenac County Department of Health and Human Services and others
Jefferys v. Supreme Court of Ohio et al
as 5:2014cv02083
Plaintiff:
Glenn J Jefferys, Jr.
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Ohio, David Tobin and Tom Rill Farm Drainage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Verhovec v. City of Northwood et al
as 3:2014cv01233
Defendant:
City of Northwood , Mark A. Stoner , Tobin Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Verhovec
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elaine Matthews v. Mary Tobin
as 13-5645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELAINE MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN TOBIN
Matthews v. Tobin
as 3:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Elaine Matthews
Defendant:
Mary Ann Tobin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. Tobin
as 5:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Elaine Matthews
Defendant:
Mary Ann Tobin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
