Cases 11 - 20 of 1,933
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Ford v. Larry Brown, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DANIEL FORD
Defendant:
LARRY BROWN, Emergency Management Section (EMS) and DEREK GOWDY, Sergeant, JFC - Security Threat Group (STG) Coordinator
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
David Kris Hall
Defendant:
Rodney Brown and Derrick Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 6:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Jamel Chawlone Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Gray v. Glenn et al
as 1:2024cv11115
Plaintiff:
Nijyal S. Gray
Defendant:
Glenn, Costello, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. BROWN
as 2:2024cv01973
Petitioner:
QUINCY RAHSAAN ANDERSON
Respondent:
Kim Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
