Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Wineinger v. Mohr et al
as 3:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Wineinger
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, N. Turner, Dr. Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Turner et al
as 3:2017cv01357
Plaintiff:
George Jasper Price
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Riano, Vicki Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Scribner, II v. Michael Donahue
as 17-5634
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DEE SCRIBNER, II
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL DONAHUE
Jones v. Donahue et al
as 3:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
Levoyd Jones
Defendant:
Ms. Donahue, D. Boyd and Scott Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Management & Training Corp., et al
as 3:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical, LLC , (FNU) Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
James D Smith
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff, Greer, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belser #352904 v. Washington et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Marvin Belser #352904
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, William Borgerding, Thomas O'Bell Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Donahue
as 3:2016cv02598
Petitioner:
Twain D. Vaughn
Respondent:
Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Storey v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-6391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH L. STOREY
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) Commissioner, JASON WOODALL, TDOC Deputy Commissioner of Operations, BRUCE WESTBROOK, former Warden of the Bledsoe County Correctional Complex in Pikeville, Tennessee and others
Belser et al v. Borgerding et al
as 2:2016cv13296
Plaintiff:
Marvin Belser, Sr., P.R.B., M.B. and others
Defendant:
William Borgerding, Obell Thomas Winn, Shane Jackson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
