Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Richard Johnson v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 13-2681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. JOHNSON, named as Richard Lee Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
ET AL DANIEL H. HEYNS, MDOC Director, named as Daniel Hynes
Johnson v. Lester
as 2:2013cv00112
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Morrow
as 3:2013cv00430
Petitioner:
James Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Morrow
as 3:2013cv00159
Petitioner:
James Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDOC et al
as 3:2012cv00843
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
TDOC, f/n/u Sinseng, Danthony Pender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Johnson v. Unknown Miron, et al
as 11-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN MIRON, UNKNOWN CONRADE, UNKNOWN SPRADER and others
Johnson #199110 v. Miron et al
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Frankie Lee Johnson #199110
Defendant:
Unknown Miron, Unknown Conrade, Unknown Sprader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McCutchen v. Macon County Sheriff's Departm, et al
as 10-6356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MCCUTCHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT LEE JOHNSON and MARK GAMMONS
McCutchen v. Macon County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2010cv00094
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Dept., Robert Lee Johnson and Mark Gammons
Plaintiff:
James McCutchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #246927 v. Berghuis et al
as 1:2007cv01026
Plaintiff:
Homer Lee Johnson #246927
Defendant:
Mary Berghuis, Tony Tague, Joseph J. Boder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
