Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Maness v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maness
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Nursing Staff, Jeff Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Forshey
as 3:2023cv01852
Petitioner:
Luke Ryan
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Luke Ryan
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Allen
Defendant:
Sheriff Blackwell, Lincoln County Sheriff Department, Luke Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2023mc00003
Defendant:
Jonathan Allen, Sheriff Blackwell, Lincoln County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quince v. Goodman
as 1:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Brandon Quince
Defendant:
Luke Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Kissner v. Joseph Orr, et al
as 22-2076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD LEE KISSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER JOSEPH MICHAEL ORR, OFFICER LUKE ROGERS, PROSECUTOR CHRIS BROWN and others
Rainey, Jr v. Goodman et al.
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Walter Rainey, Jr
Defendant:
Luke Goodman, Medical Staff, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hammond
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Luke Jackson, Jr
Defendant:
Jim Hammond, Officer Wyatt and Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lewis et al
as 1:2022mc00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Randall Lewis, Luke Burns, Alan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
