Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Brooks v. Rose et al (TVV)
as 3:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Russell Dale Brooks
Defendant:
Carroll Rose, Earl Loy, Jr and Rodney Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orta v. USA
as 2:2013cv07265
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lois Jochinto Orta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oswald Nelson v. Lois DeBerry Spc. Needs Fclty., et al
as 13-5091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSWALD NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOIS DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITY, BOB ERWIN, Classification, F/N/U BAMBEE, Dr., Unit 4 Manager and others
Oswald Nelson v. Lois DeBerry Spc. Needs Fclty., et al
as 12-6609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSWALD NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOIS DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITY, BOB ERWIN, Classification, F/N/U BAMBEE, Dr., Unit 4 Manager and others
Brooks v. Union County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
Russell Dale Brooks
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff Department, Union County Jail, Earl Loy, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Nelson v. Lois DeBerry Special Needs Facility et al
as 3:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
Oswald Urban Nelson
Defendant:
Lois DeBerry Special Needs Facility, Bob Erwin, f/n/u Bambee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility
as 3:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
James Logan
Defendant:
Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLachlan v. USA
as 2:2011cv15442
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lois McLachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moss v. Minor et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Joshuwa M Moss
Defendant:
Rodney Minor, Earl Loy, Jr, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
