Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Williams v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv01911
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Williams
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and Michael J. Cheselka, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Williams, et al v. Donald Schismenos, et al
as 17-3786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BRENT WILLIAMS and THERESA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD SCHISMENOS, Badge No. 950, Individually and in his official capacity, JESSIE LEESER, Badge No. 1030, Individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF AKRON, OH
Kelly v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv02162
Plaintiff:
Donatello Kelly
Defendant:
M. Williams, D. Harris, Bill Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Schismenos et al
as 5:2015cv02345
Defendant:
Donald Schismenos, Jessie Leeser and City of Akron
Plaintiff:
Edward Brent Williams and Theresa M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. McGee et al
as 2:2014cv02529
Plaintiff:
Michael Sims
Defendant:
McGee, Kornegay, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Williams
as 5:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Taylor
Defendant:
Anthony M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. DeLong et al
as 0:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Williams
Defendant:
DeLong, Price, E. Rokoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davidson et al
as 4:2010cv13898
Plaintiff:
Sam Smith
Defendant:
Lynn M Davidson, Deborah Ellis, Michael Wendling and others
Canada v. Shelby County Shriff's Office et al
as 2:2009cv02768
Plaintiff:
Robert Canada
Defendant:
Shelby County Shriff's Office, M. William, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ketzner, et al v. Ray Williams, et al
as 08-2430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. KETZNER and WILLIAM D. LOVETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY M. WILLIAMS, DAVE J. BURNETT, Reverend, DEBORAH LAWRENCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.