Cases 21 - 30 of 240
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Burns #302423 v. Schroeder
as 2:2021cv00192
Petitioner:
Zachary Loren Burns #302423
Respondent:
Douglas R. Lloyd and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairley #297836 v. Fidler et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Lewis Fairley #297836
Defendant:
Unknown Fidler, Unknown Burns, A. Maiga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Nurse Murray, Jamie Mosley and Lt. Burns
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Stinnett, Tyler Thomas Roger Rose and Tony Allen Stamper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. Mosley et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Lt. Burns and Sgt. Murray
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Stinnett, Tyler Thomas Roger Rose and Tony Allen Stamper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Schroeder
as 2:2021cv10489
Petitioner:
Zachary Loren Burns
Defendant:
Robert Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Whipple v. Laurel County Correctional Center et al
as 6:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Laurel County Correctional Center, Sgt Trevillion, Sgt Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Chauncey M. Marsh
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Evan Michael Miesler, Juan Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
