Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Hamer v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
Damein Hamer
Defendant:
Henderson County, Henderson County Justice Center, Jackie FNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penman v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alice Penman
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Doug Crall, Deborah Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Duke v. McVey et al
as 1:2017cv01177
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Duke
Defendant:
James McVey, Monterious Bradford and Whiteville Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv00149
Petitioner:
Alkaben Patel
Respondent:
Jeffrey Sessions, Elaine C. Duke, Ricardo Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Enriquez-Perdomo v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv00147
Petitioner:
Riccy Mabel Enriquez-Perdomo
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, Elaine Duke, Carlton Shier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis Jones, et al v. Tom Finco, et al
as 17-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEWIS JONES
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALHOUN, KENNETH VANWAYNE CLARK, KENNETH VANWAYNE CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM FINCO, Deputy Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), MIKE MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator (MDOC), BRAD PURVES, Dietician and Food Service Manager (MDOC) and others
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
