Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Demos v. Kraft Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Kraft Foods Inc., Dole Food Co. Inc., Yum Brands Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cletus Franklin v. Dustin Chumley, et al
as 16-6380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLETUS JOHN ROBERT FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN CHUMLEY, WTSP Sergeant and Disciplinary Hearing Officer, JAMES ERIC HOLLOWAY, Warden, WTSP, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) Commissioner and others
Rawls #211542 v. Washington
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Rawls #211542
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls #211542 v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
John Robert Rawls #211542
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin and Michael Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
William Bryant, Stanley Dickerson, James Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. Proctor & Gamble
as 1:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Chumley et al
as 2:2015cv02546
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin
Defendant:
Dustin Chumley, James Holloway and Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. William Nettles, et al
as 15-5474
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM N. NETTLES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ALAN WILSON and others
Rochester v. R.B Harwell, et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J.M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
