Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Neal El v. Tischler
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Maurice Neal El
Defendant:
Beth A. Tischler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith et al v. El Paso County Sheriff et al
as 3:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith and MShafer@FBI.gov
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff and f/n/u Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, et al v. State of Colorado, et al
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith, Night Hawk, MShafer@FBI.gov and others
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Governor f/n/u Nis, Colorado Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. El Paso County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff's Office, f/n/u Myers, f/n/u Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox El et al v. 38th District Court et al
as 2:2022cv12940
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maddox El and Keith Maddox El
Defendant:
38th District Court, TPR Desnyder and Koenigsmann
Maddox El v. Maddox El et al
as 2:2022cv12939
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maddox El and Keith Maddox El
Defendant:
38th District Court, Brian Thome, Dale Vande Vrede and others
Schenk et al v. McKee et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Breana Schenk, Everitt McKee, Emmitt McKee and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Kelsey Delylah Schenk-McKee
Defendant:
Elijah McKee, Paul A Thomas, Danny Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Sanodio et al
as 3:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Officer (f/n/u) Sanodio and El Paso County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox El v. 38th District Court
as 2:2022cv12811
Petitioner:
Kevin Maddox El
Respondent:
38th District Court
Maddox El v. Wickerson
as 2:2022cv12810
Petitioner:
Kevin Maddox El
Respondent:
38th District Court and Anthony Wickerson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
