Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Ramon Santos v. J. Shartle
as 10-4570
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMON A. SANTOS
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Joseph Goncalves, Jr. v. Steve Beshear, et al
as 10-5782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SANTO'S GONCALVES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE BESHEAR, Govenor of Kentucky, JOHN D. REES, Commissioner of KY DOC, THOMAS SIMPSON, Warden, of Kentucky State Penitentiary and others
Joseph Goncalves, Jr. v. Steve Beshear, et al
as 10-5701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SANTO'S GONCALVES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE BESHEAR, Govenor of Kentucky, JOHN D. REES, Commissioner of KY DOC, THOMAS SIMPSON, Warden, of Kentucky State Penitentiary and others
Santos v. Shartle
as 4:2010cv01087
Petitioner:
Ramon A. Santos
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Canales et al
as 1:2009cv00600
Defendant:
Santos Canales
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Torres et al
as 2:2009cv12927
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Roberson
Defendant:
J. Torres, De Los Santos, Lee McRoberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Roberson #290290 v. Torres et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Roberson #290290
Defendant:
J. Torres, De Los Santos, Lee McRoberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goncalves v. Beshear et al
as 3:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Joseph Santo's Goncalves, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Beshear, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gross v. Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Gross, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons, Louis Milusmic, Unknown Designating Team and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Santos v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv01105
Petitioner:
Juan Santos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
