Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Schrimer v. Powell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tyler Schrimer and Tyler Schirmer
Defendant:
Powell County Detention Center, Powell County Sheriff Department, George Nester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner v. Schiebner
as 4:2023cv10080
Petitioner:
Christian Andrew Gardner
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Akers v. Hicks et al
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Lena Akers
Defendant:
Deputy Gary Hicks, Aaron Acree, Trigg County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins #742687 v. Gauderer et al
as 1:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
Christian Ernst Gauderer, Heidi E. Washington, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. USA
as 3:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
A Philip Thomas Christian Daugherty
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Walden #614234 v. Curley
as 2:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Christian Robert Walden #614234
Respondent:
Donald Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Boyd, Christian County Jail, Wendall Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
